But ! if u people dont mind (dont take me splitter again ;) ) then i would say while considering Classpath for library we should design in such a way that if some one want to replace with its own (his own wish thats what OSS is ) then he can do it easily. (and i hope follwowing the TCK it could be accomplish too as well )
On 5/16/05, S. Meslin-Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Geir, > > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 06:47:40AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > I have no intention of forking GNU Classpath. Even if we wanted to, > > we couldn't because of the license. > > > > Just to be clear on this point, the license for GNU Classpath is > GPL+Exception and does not prohibit forking. > > I believe you are saying that "forking and relicensing under an Apache > license" isn't currently feasible. The forking block is merely a license > incompatibility in this context (and has a separate discussion). > > I think that when referring to "the license" or "the licenses" we should > be more clear as to which licenses we mean otherwise we run the risk of > confusing those unfamiliar with current context. > > Best Regards, > > Steph > > -- > ================================================================ > Stephane Meslin-Weber Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Software Engineer Web: http://odonata.tangency.co.uk > ================================================================ > > > BodyID:55162909.2.n.logpart (stored separately) > > -- Usman Bashir Certified IBM XML Solution Developer Certified UML Developer Brainbench Certified Internet Perfessional[advance](BCIP) Brainbench Certified Java Perfessional (BCJP) Brainbench Certified .NET Perfessional Brainbench Ceritified C++ Perfessional (BCCP) Software engineer IT24 Faculty Member Operation Badar Lahore
