CPL-ed code is fine for us to include and distribute (not host)
geir
On May 13, 2005, at 1:45 PM, Patrice Le Vexier wrote:
hi everybody,
the same for kaffe, no ? And what about the CPL license of jykesRVM ?
patrice
-----Message d'origine----- De : Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy� : Friday, May 13, 2005 1:37 PM � : [email protected]; Rodrigo Kumpera Objet : Re: JIT vs. WAT
Great Question. adding it to my legal list :)
On 5/13/05, Rodrigo Kumpera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be great to be GCJ compatible. Leveraging they effort with the binary ABI is a smart move and will promote more harmony instead of fragmentation between the java ahead-of-time systems.
But this raises a question, can Harmony use GCJ's binary ABI
without been GPL?
Rodrigo
On 5/13/05, Panagiotis Astithas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob wrote:
IMHO both JITs and pre-compiling have their place.. it depends on the application whether one is definitely better than the other.
Ideally, the design of harmony would allow for people to pursue both approaches and the two could coexist peacefully.
This is a recipe for a bloated system that never works.
Also, most app
programmers don't want to worry about the details of how
their program
is compiled.
-- Bob
And how would a componentized system with multiple
configuration choices
force them to? The Sun JVM has many GC algorithms to choose from, yet
many people are unaware of it and use happily the default.
Cheers,
Panagiotis
-- Panagiotis Astithas EBS, Electronic Business Systems Ltd. 18 Evgenidou Street, 115 25, Athens GREECE Phone: +30 210 674 7631 Fax: +30 210 674 7601 http://www.ebs.gr
-- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
-- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
