>Then, if the VM is written in Java it will be compiled to native code using, >for example, gcj? >or it will be compiled to byte code and will be interpreted by itself? >I'm a little bit confused about this topic
same goes here On 5/18/05, Juan Leyva Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then, if the VM is written in Java it will be compiled to native code > using, > for example, gcj? > or it will be compiled to byte code and will be interpreted by itself? > > I'm a little bit confused about this topic > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:46 PM > Subject: Re: Developing Harmony > > > > Ozgur Akan wrote: > >> JVM in Java will be the slower then Sun`s JVM. C or C++ is a better > >> choice. > > > > You have to undertand that "written in Java" does *NOT* equate > necessarely > > as "will be run as interpreted bytecode". > > > > -- > > Stefano. > > > > > >
