> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 5/20/05 9:51:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [arch] VM Candidate : JikesRVM
http://jikesrvm.sourceforge.net/
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I disagree with the permise of what you are saying. Let me say "the
> > wrong thing"
> >
> > 1. There are no open source virtual machines that are presently
> > practical to run high volume production code (yes I know you all run
> > kaffe whatever for XYZ and love it to death, but I mean non-entusiasts
> > would run it too).
> >
> > 2. There are no Java virtual machines period that are presently
> > practical to run high volume production code.
>
> I meant Java virtual machines written in Java... sorry
>
Does anyone have any benchmarks on such designs?
As a hard-core real-time and device driver guy,
I am rather skeptical that this is anything else
but a conflict in requirements, runtime performance
in execution speed versus interpretability and/or
compilability of the runtime module.
But then again, I've only been working with Java
at all for less than four years :-)
> >
> > I will start:
I will add the first enhancement:
> >
> >
> > #include<stdio.h>
> >
> > main () {
> > printf("Harmony JVM version .001\n");
exit(0); // Your compiler may or may not require stdlib.h
> > }
> >
Dan Lydick
