Hello, > > > And you can circumvent the language protection (package private...) > > if you work hard enough too, I believe... > > > > Keeping out of "java.lang" seems wise if we can arrange it...
> By writing _only_ java.lang and java.lang.*, > we can truly speak of a separate implementation. > Adding only _parts_ of libraries like GNU ClassPath > would mean that users would implement Harmony library > policies, not Sun's, FSF's, or anybody elses. Blatant Not-Invented-Hereism. This isn't about "Control over the implementation", this was about language protection features. The FSF doesn't have any "library policy". What are you talking about? > By writing _only_ java.lang and java.lang.*, > we can truly speak of a separate implementation. Why do you need a seperate implementation? /Sven
