Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > You are misrepresenting the problem. it's not that it's language > protection, but that you extend java.lang namespace and are hoping > that you don't get tromped by the spec at some point in the future. > (Nor is it clear that it's good citizenship working in that > namespace as well...)
Please send a patch to classpath-patches with your alternative approach, or shut up already ;-) Regards, Jeroen
