On Jun 8, 2005, at 5:16 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
On 08-06-2005 00:08, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I. Division of Repository
+1
II. Specific Access Control Lists
+1
We could consider setting up a totally separate SVN repo for this,
because
the svn-authorization file would be the authoritive source of
"tainting
info" and we may want to publish that file.
Yes, good idea
III. Strict Limits on Committer Contribution
+1
IV. Be Proactive in Committer Education
+1
We could have [a legal form] as part of a standard svn commit message
template, for example. Other ideas welcome.
Perhaps employ a post-commit hook that rejects commits that don't
have a
filled-out template.
Well, I was thinking more of an informational message, but a short,
simple set of Y/N questions might help. OTOH, people might just get
in the habit of just doing the right answers, and not reading...
we might consider a form asking information like the following.
There's a lot in there. I don't feel qualified to comment.
Comments?
Expanding on what I said in my other e-mail, "committer" is
something that
has many non-legal connotations here at the ASF. It might make
sense to
define all or most of this in terms of contributors. WDYT?
Yes - "Authorized Contributor" as a defined term as one who has
executed the form.
geir
- Leo
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
