On 8/28/05, David Tanzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 07:15 -0700, Weldon Washburn wrote: > > [Snip] > > > Another suggestion: IMHO it would be good to use the Java Coding > > > Conventions in C/C++ code too. While this has the disadvantage that > > > the coding style in the C/C++ code might be inconsistent in some places > > > it would have the great advantage that all code (and all interfaces) > > > we write use the same coding style. > > > > Good idea! Perhaps you could rewrite a few of the APIs I have posted > > in Java Coding Conventions style. We could then discuss the merits. > > If it makes sense, I would then rewrite field_access.txt, etc. to > > reflect the proposed style. > > I have added method_access_java_conv.txt to the wiki, which is > method_access.txt rewritten according to the Java Coding Conventions.
I looked at method_access_java_conv.txt. It looks like only cosmetic changes. I don't have any objection to what you are proposing. Does anyone else have comments/questions? > > Regards, David. > > -- > David Tanzer, Haghofstr. 29, A-3352 St. Peter/Au, Austria/Europe > http://deltalabs.at -- http://dev.guglhupf.net -- http://guglhupf.net > My PGP Public Key: http://guglhupf.net/david/david.asc > -- > Are You Pondering What I'm Pondering? > Umm, I think so Brain-2, but a show about two talking lab mice? > It'll never get on the air! > >
