On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:11:22PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:13 AM, Anthony Green wrote: > > >On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 10:47 -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> > >>Yup. I think dual licensing with the LGPL should be sufficient for > >>that to happen, > >>and get us rolling forward in that aspect as well. > > > >Rather than dual license the code, maybe switching to LGPL+exception > >would be better. The GNU FOO+exception licenses say that you can > >redistribute using the FOO license at will. > > > >But what would be the point of a relicensing effort like this? > >AFAICT, > >many people here show no interest in collaborating on a single free > >class library project. > > But others do, so if we can use both, we can give people the choice > to work on what they want, and users to use what they want.
+1. cheers, dalibor topic > > geir > > -- > Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
