Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Sure, if you don't want the runtime effects of OSGi then you have
flexibility to package the classes into any shape, including an rt.jar.
However, if we want to support runtime modularity including component
versioning etc. then we will have to have a number of discrete bundles.
If OSGi has the ability to put multiple bundles into a single JAR ...
I thnk you are missing my point. Sorry. What I'm saying/asking is
about OSGi being one [of many possible] delivery "packagings" of the
class libraries.
Can you think of any other runtime modularity systems that we should
consider supporting?
Sadly "rt.jar" because I hope that other VMs will support our VM/lib
interface, and thus our classlib, and manybe not yet do OSGi.
Clearly I didn't read Tim's question. Or if I did, I didn't answer it.
I don't consider rt.jar a runtime modularity system. I was
just thinking of packagings of the library...
geir
