On 1/18/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mikhail Loenko wrote: > > Seems like I've managed to reproduce the problem: > > > > I've refactored the code using Eclipse: all that is under > > com.openintel.drl.security > > I've moved under > > org.apache.harmony > > Can you make that org.apache.harmony.security -- then we keep the module > name in there. When we build into a single rt.jar it will avoid any > unfortunate name collisions with implementations in other modules.
my misprint in the mail... > > > Then I've searched for and found 18 files that still contained > > "com.openintel.drl.security" for some reason, and made > > search&replace > > > > After that build failed: > > BUILD FAILED > > build.xml:393: Test java.security.serialization.CodeSignerTest failed > > > > Will investigate... > > > > > > BTW, where will we move "com.openintel.drlx" to? > > > > org.apache.harmony_x ? > > org.apache.harmonx ? > > org.apache.hx ? > > Yuk! let's stick with org.apache.harmony.<whatever> package names. how would you distinguish between support classes for java.security and javax.security? we need org.apache.something and org.apache.extension_of_something Thanks, Mikhail > > Regards, > Tim > > > Thanks, > > Mikhail > > > > > > On 1/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've just updated from SVN, all unit tests from security2 passed > >> (including serialization ones). > >> Could you please provide more details? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Mikhail > >> > >> > >> On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I am haplessly plodding along. I found one problem (mine) which fixed a > >>> test, and now I seem to have a more interesting problem with the > >>> serialization tests... > >>> > >>> Are the serialization tests "golden data" files somehow dependent the > >>> com.openintel package structure and would be allergic to a > >>> org.apache.harmony package structure? > >>> > >>> geir > >>> > >>> > >>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > >>>> I've been trying to refactor security2 into the org.apache pacakage > >>>> space. > >>>> > >>>> I'm now having test failures. > >>>> > >>>> Can someone else do a co of security2 and verify? I've backed out the > >>>> change so that you need junit and bcprov on your classpath (argh!) and > >>>> turned on haltonfailure so that the tests will stop once something goes > >>>> wrong. > >>>> > >>>> I thought I was being careful - while it's clear that I have no idea > >>>> what I'm doing, there's clearly something a little more subtle going on > >>>> here because I wouldn't think that just moving package names would be a > >>>> problem. I assume that there's some provider or other configuration-ish > >>>> issue. > >>>> > >>>> This would be a good learning experience for all of us how this works. I > >>>> need to run out for about 20 min... bbiab. > >>>> > >>>> geir > >>>> > >>>> > > > > -- > > Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > IBM Java technology centre, UK. >
