Some of the concurrent collections have code from the JDK, but these can be just discarded. The pedigree can be asserted by Doug Lea himself, I think he is on the list.
It was the intent of the expert group to allow the reference implementation be used by FOSS jvms. Rodrigo, On 1/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/readme?annotate=1.1 > > On 1/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The question I'd have is who wrote it - is there any exposure risk? > > "public domain" doesn't mean "clean pedigree"... > > > > But yes, certainly worth investigating. Can you look into it? > > > > Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > > > Can we import the backport of jsr-166 as the starting point for > > > implementing this package? It's released as public domain, so there > > > should be not license issue IFAIK. > > > > > > There are only a few things required make it work, like removing > > > references to com.sun.Unsafe. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ >
