Mikhail Loenko wrote: > depending on the bug... actually, this is the answer I would give too (which I know is not very helpful).
Some apparent 'bugs' are ambiguities in the spec, or a different choice of under-specified behavior that we likely want to match to ensure compatibility; others may be deemed implementation bugs that we should not recreate. Sometimes it's a tough call, we should seek consensus on the dev list. > I would not like to be compatible with SIGSEGVs :) We'll have our own versions ;-) Regards, Tim > Thanks, > Mikhail > > On 2/16/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2006/2/16, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Tests should be written to the javadoc spec, rather than deducing >>> behavior from any particular implementation. >> By the way... >> Do we want to be bug compatible with reference implementation? >> >> -- >> Alexey A. Petrenko >> Intel Middleware Products Division >> > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
