Gerry Steele wrote:
you can ask that question. Cause i agree what the *($%^ is going on.
Seriously. I hope it is with regard to the philosophical enquiry into
the persuasive nature of technological advancement.

Not how the bible is the handbook for the persuasive appropriation of
the waterfall method upon engineers cause, you know, he liked to walk
on water and ultimately he fell to his death cause of this fallacy.

Or most logically, a programmer who happens to think he is a
theologian. But whats more, append it to his credentials. Now that is
silly.

Hopefully, the first two are closer to reality.

A good friend of mine used to have "cat juggler" as his title and I was thinking about using "software plumber" as mine at one point.

I tend to prefer somebody who admits to be a religiously attached to something than those who pretend to be objective about it and deep inside they are not.

Not sure this is the case, but that's how I read it.

--
Stefano.

Reply via email to