So, are we going to mark deprecated stuff? Thanks, Mikhail
2006/3/1, karan malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > > We want any javadoc for javax.* classes to have a pointer to the sun > > javadoc (so it's clear we aren't trying to reproduce the spec) and > > have information about *our* implementation, clarifications, how we > > interpreted the spec, etc. > > > Thanks. Thats what I wanted to know, javadocs for javax.* classes. > > > > > karan malhi wrote: > > > >> Will the javadoc have to match exactly with the RI api docs? > >> > >> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> karan malhi wrote: > >>> > >>>> Do we need to add javadoc comments in classes? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Sure. Javadoc is good. > >>> > >>>> How to deal with deprecated classes,methods and constructors? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Mark them deprecated? > >>> > >>>> My guess is that we should not care whether something is deprecated > >>>> or not. We would still need that stuff for backward compatibility. > >>>> However, I still would like to know if we need to keep certain > >>>> rules/guidelines in mind when implementing deprecated stuff. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> People use deprecated stuff. I think that there is no difference in > >>> "rules", but probably in how much effort.... > >>> > >>> geir > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- > Karan Singh > >
