Leo Simons wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:50:02AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
can I vote a "blank statement +1" that you can use to move code into SVN?
I think that if you would like to make a +1 blanket statement, then
we'll count that in the future.
In my mind, in terms of "people that have reviewed what is going on and
what is going into SVN and that the paperwork is ok", it doesn't count.
No statement in that case is better.
I mean, if we have the paperwork, let's move the code in, whether or not
we end up releasing it will require another vote anyway.
However, for awareness, oversight and participation, I think we still
should be voting code in.
+1. "I trust Geir got it right" is bad since it creates a dependency on Geir
and moreover doesn't scale well (and scaling, we need...). However, changing
to a commit-then-review mode might help, and might scale better.
I understand what you mean but I assume that the "lump" contributions
will stop as work effort converts to be entirely w/in the project. (And
no "Geir got it right" is the wrong way to go...)
Also, as a podling, post-start code contributions have been the subject
of recent Incubator PMC concern and scrutiny, so lets keep the oversight.
We have a 3 day timeout for these, so if someone missed the vote, it's
ok, we just ensure that there are no vetos and 3 +1s.
geir
