Hi Tim,
We have read the contribution policy and we are ready to sign
the following documents -we've questions on some of them, so please
advice-:
- SG & CCLA (http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt ):
Signed by the CEO of ITC. The CCLA should list the team leaders
as authorized contributors
- Bulk Contribution Checklist
(http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/bulk_contribution_checklist.txt):
One for each package, signed by the team leader, and specifying
the list of developers (authors)
- ICLA (http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt):
One for each person designated as authorized contributor (or
should it be one for each author?)
- ACQ (http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/auth_cont_quest.txt ):
One for each person designated as authorized contributor (or
should it be one for each author?)
Is this ok? where should we send this documents?
Thanks,
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Lunes, 06 de Marzo de 2006 01:54 p.m.
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: ITC's Contribution
Iris Gastañaga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On behalf of ITC (Cordoba Institute of Technology)from Argentina.I
> want to offer a code contribution of the
> following packages:
>
> - java.math (led by Daniel Fridlender)
> - java.crypto (led by Miguel Montes)
> - java.rmi (led by Daniel Gándara)
>
> Last year the ITC decided to start a "clean-room" java package
> development
> project; now we are proud to make this donation and we hope it be
> accepted as a valid
> contribution (which we believe it is).
That is fantastic Iris! thanks.
> Having said this, I do have a few questions:
>
> a) Next Steps?
> which are the next steps? we have read the contribution policy and
we
> are
> ok with that; we'll send aditional questions regarding documents to be
> signed on a separated email.
We can help with a quick overview of the contribution requirements for
acceptance -- that would be the logical next steps. Looks like the
other questions have been pulled out into separate threads, so let's
deal with them there.
Regards,
Tim
> b) Harmony 1.5?
> we have developed J2SE 1.5 compliant/dependant packages -following the
> specs
> of harmony project-; but we see that currently Harmony is not 1.5 but
> 1.4.
> Is there an schedule or plan to get Harmony J2SE 1.5?
>
> c) Some still missing components...
> we have checked some pre-conditions before making this announcement
and
> we
> found that there are some components we need (i.e.: concurrent) which
> are
> not on Harmony yet. Is someone working on those missing components?
>
> we'll be waiting for comments,
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ing. Iris Gastañaga
> --------------------------------------------------
> Executive Director
> Instituto Tecnológico Córdoba
> Córdoba Business Tower, Piso 15
> Tel: +54 (351) 5710022 / 23
> www.fitc.unc.edu.ar
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PS: we will send mails with specific package information.
> PS1: we do know that java.math and java.crypto have already been
> donated,
> but we do believe our code is a valid donation.
> PS2: for each package we have developed a set of test cases (public
api)
>
> that we are willing to donate too.
>
>
>
>
>
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
