I assume that you noted the jura entry in the commit log..... -----Original Message----- From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed Mar 15 11:44:19 2006 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49] ...
Yes, the log message is only shown in the first commit message in the set. That particular commit is the HARMONY-57 bulk contribution that was voted on by the -dev list. The other big commit I did today is the HARMONY-88 bulk contribution that was also accepted by the -dev list. I'm not *that* productive! Regards, Tim Magnusson, Geir wrote: > Isn't this the initial commit for somwthing we just voted in? > > (me in car so can't see right now....) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed Mar 15 11:34:35 2006 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49] ... > > 49 commit messages for a single commit! The continuous wash-in of > Really Big(tm) chunks of code scares me a little (even if its real cool) > -- usually I make it policy to read every single line of code contributed > to a project for which I'm on the PMC but there's no chance in hell I'm > going to spend an entire weekend reading unit tests. Just keeping up amounts > to something close to a fulltime job. The "usual" "oversight" model that at > least some parts of the ASF are used to seems near-impossible to apply here. > > Will all people able to read every line of code as it comes in please raise > their hands? > > I'm thinking about how to make this stuff scale. Any ideas? The natural > tendency is to want to partition, but that way we lose the "many eyes" > advantages.... > > Anyway, just a random thought... > > - Leo > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
