No worries. I figured it was something like that, although i'll be the first to admit that I do and say laughable things.
Focus on the talk. Do we say 'good luck' or 'break a leg', show biz style? Too bad we don't have swing and awt yet. Would be memorable to demonstrate IDEA running in Harmony at Eclipsecon... Geir (also behind on email, sending this from gate k3 in ORD). -----Original Message----- From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed Mar 22 10:16:02 2006 To: [email protected] Subject: sorry (was: Re: [result] Re: [vote] Acceptance of HARMONY-39 : Contribution of beans, regex and math class library code) Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > Tim Ellison wrote: <snip> >> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: <snip> >>> With the "custom" of putting in things in o.a.h.t are we >>> implicitly discouraging good testing practice? >> >> This is laughable. > > You are going to have to explain why it's "laughable". If you are > testing a.b.c.Foo and you have to do it from a.b.c.test.FooTest, how can > you ever do implementation testing of Foo? It's not an unreasonable > question. Certainly not "laughable". I'm behind on my mail at the moment as I prepare for the Harmony talk at eclipsecon -- so I'll give you a proper answer later, but I wanted to apologize straight away if my flippant response caused offense. I hope you know I don't mean it personally. I'm passionate about the *technology* ! and it kinda spilled over ;-) I'll behave better... Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
