Dalibor, On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:46:16AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:32:19AM -0500, Etienne Gagnon wrote: > > 5- The ASF provides me with an official, legally binding document, > > signed by officers that have sufficient rights to do so, stating that > > it will only sub-license (distribute, etc.) code contributed by SableVM > > authors (can be identified specifically) and derivatives of this code, > > under licenses that require explicit acknowledgment of the copyright > > of these authors and that require redistribution of the related text > > found in the NOTICE file. [I have no trouble letting the ASF lawyers > > come up with some text proposal. I would highly suggest reusing words > > off the Apache License 2.0 to do so. I can even propose some text, if > > you wish me to do so.] > > Is the intent that you want to be able to claim copyright on VMs linking > to Harmony's VM modules?
Huh? Regardless of intent (something I can't answer for obviously), how would that possibly be a valid claim? Attribution of A with regard to X is not in any way related to copyright of A with regard to Y, right? Leo *scratches head a lot these days* Simons
