2006/4/11, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > > > > > Paulex Yang wrote: > >> Mark > >> > >> You just point out a serious issue ;-) . The RI is just a concept, in > >> fact we have many RIs, Sun's JDK, BEA's JDK, even different versions, > >> Sun JDK 1.5.0, 1.5.0.04, 1.5.0.06...(even more in future I expects), > >> and on different platforms(win32, linux32, still even more in > >> future)...In fact sometimes they have different behavior themselves, > >> it is very reasonable that 1.5.06 fix some bugs of 1.5.0, so that > >> some different exceptions thrown(more reasonable IAE instead of NPE, > >> for example), or more seriously, different results returned... > >> Samples are available upon request:). > > > > Actually, there only is one RI for any given spec, and in this case, I > > guess we judge it to be the latest version of a spec that comes from > > Sun? (The question isn't if it comes from Sun - as the spec lead, they > > supply the RI - but rather what version...) > Yes, I agree with you, there should be only one RI. And I suggest to > stick with Sun's 1.5.0 with latest revision (i.e. 1.5.0_06 by now).
Agree:) > > > geir > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Paulex Yang > China Software Development Lab > IBM > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Best Regards! Jimmy, Jing Lv China Software Development Lab, IBM
