2006/4/11, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > testRequestPasswordAuthentication1() > > I mean, why do we want to embed all that crap in the testcase name? Who > cares? The only person that will care is someone fixing when a testcase > breaks, and they'll read the code...
To make our code easy and clear to read, a good naming convention is necessary as I think, that's why I dare say testRequestPasswordAuthentication1() is not so good for people to tell which method is tested here. The current naming convention is not bad but take too mang characters. Your opinion?:) geir > > > LvJimmy，Jing wrote: > > Hi all: > > > > Following our testcase naming convention, I've find a name as: (hope > it > > won't break your screen :)) > > public void > > > test_requestPasswordAuthentication_java_lang_String_java_net_InetAddress_int_java_lang_String_java_lang_String_java_lang_String_java_net_URL_java_net_Authenticator_RequestorType() > > which is the testcase for > > java.net.Authenticator.requestPasswordAuthentication( > > String rHost, InetAddress rAddr, int rPort, String > rProtocol, > > String rPrompt, String rScheme, URL rURL, > > Authenticator.RequestorType reqType); > > and the class has another two method named > requestPasswordAuthentication, > > and only this method take URL and RequestorType as its parameters. > > The name is somehow too long to see and read, and I guess we can > find a > > shorter one for it, > > e.g.test_requestPasswordAuthentication_URL_RequestorType. As URL and > > RequestorType can identify the exactly > > method to test. Or a adjusted naming convention shall be take. Any > opinions? > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards! > > > > Jimmy, Jing Lv > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Best Regards! Jimmy, Jing Lv China Software Development Lab, IBM
