Why must we testing the hostname? Why not test the actual address, 127.0.0.1? That should be much more reliable and less platform dependent.
Regards, Mark. On 4/12/06, LvJimmy，Jing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi: > > 2006/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On 4/11/06, Paulex Yang wrote: > > > > > > [SNIP] > > > > > > > > I've run tests on Linux. They fail on the same assertion: > > > > [junit] Testcase: testReceiveSend_Block_Normal( > > > > org.apache.harmony.tests.java.nio.channels.DatagramChannelTest ): > > > FAILED > > > > [junit] expected:<...> but was:<....localdomain> > > > > [junit] junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...> but > > > > was:<....localdomain> > > > > [junit] at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.harmony.tests.java.nio.channels.DatagramChannelTest.receiveByChannel > > > > (DatagramChannelTest.java:1681) > > > > [junit] at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.harmony.tests.java.nio.channels.DatagramChannelTest.testReceiveSend_Block_Normal > > > > (DatagramChannelTest.java:1419) > > > > [junit] at java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.invokeV( > > > > AccessibleObject.java:205) > > > > > > > Stepan, > > > > > > Thank you for the information. > > > > As far as JUnit didn't print what result was expected to get I > > inserted > > > > printing to the test and got the following: > > > > Expected host: localhost.localdomain > > > > Recieved host: localhost > > > > > > > > Why do you expect that on Linux "localhost.localdomain" should be > > > returned? > > > > > > > Well, that is because both RI/Harmony return this value on my test > > > machines(Redhat ES 3, Redhat 9 and latest stable Debian), and I didn't > > > expect this value is dependent on configuration(or Linux distribution? > > > ), but as your test result shows, it probably does! So would you tell me > > > your linux distro version and configuration( for example, what it looks > > > like of the item on localhost in /etc/hosts)? so that I can check if > > > this constant value(localhost.localdomain) is platform dependent. > > > > > > Hi Paulex, > > > > I run tests on SUSE LINUX ES 9, file /etc/hosts contains the next entry: > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > > > Currently I have a linux workstation, file /porc/version show it is > "Linux version 2.4.21-15.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc > version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-34)) #1 SMP Thu Apr 22 00:18:24 > EDT 2004", and its /etc/hosts tells: > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost > google tells me that Debian3.1 and redhat 8.0 also contain this field > defaultly. > Shall we call it as platform-release-dependency problems? :) > > The are no entries with " localhost.localdomain". Today also I run these > > tests on WinXP - all DatagramChannelTest passed but SocketChannelTest > > (testReadByteBuffer_NonBlocking_ReadWriteRealTooLargeData) failed with the > > following diagnostics: > > > > expected:<24820> but was:<65536> > > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<24820> but was:<65536> at > > > > org.apache.harmony.tests.java.nio.channels.SocketChannelTest.testReadByteBuffer_NonBlocking_ReadWriteRealTooLargeData > > (SocketChannelTest.java :2579) at > > java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.invokeV( > > AccessibleObject.java:205) > > > > Is this enough for you to identify a problem? Please let me know if you > > need > > more info. > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan. > > > > And I'll also look more inside to see if there can be other cause except > > > for the possible platform difference. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Stepan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> And before everything's OK, I'm fine if you choose to add > > > >> DatagramChannelTest into exclude list, by adding it to Ln.94 of > > > >> modules/nio/make/common/build.xml, just as ServerSocketChannelTest. > > > >> > > > >> Sorry for the inconvenience caused. > > > >> > > > >>> And there are new 15 test failures. So now if I'll make a code > > update > > > >>> > > > >> or a > > > >> > > > >>> bug fix how I can be 100% sure that I don't do any regression? > > > >>> > > > >>> Currently if a commit breaks the Harmony classlib build a > > notification > > > >>> > > > >> with > > > >> > > > >>> subject: "[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Classlib/linux.ia32" will be > > send > > > >>> > > > >> to > > > >> > > > >>> harmony-commits mailing list. Is it possible to have the same for > > > tests? > > > >>> > > > >> I > > > >> > > > >>> mean that after completing automatic build the existing classlib > > tests > > > >>> > > > >> suite > > > >> > > > >>> should be run. If there are failing tests then a report notification > > > >>> > > > >> with > > > >> > > > >>> corresponding subject will be send. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> Stepan Mishura > > > >>> Intel Middleware Products Division > > > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards! > > Jimmy, Jing Lv > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > -- Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Java Technology Centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
