2006/4/15, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote: > > > One day, with Harmony spreading all over the world, I don't want to > > hear anyone saying: "Woo, who's that guy writing these tests named > > 'test1,test2,test3', it takes me a lot of time on understanding them, > > No one's advocating that, so please put that straw-man back whereever it > came from.
OK, just imagination, ignore if you dont think so:) But developers may do laugh at those silly-looking code. > even a mid-school student can do better than this!" > > I agreed that our naming convention must: > > 1. make it understandable for everyone, what does this method try to do, > > or at least contain a hint (most important) > > 2. easy to distinguish if there are some similar ones > > 3. as short/easy as possible for people to read > > Any comments? > > Yes. > > test<SomethingUsefulWithMaybeANumberIfItsOverloadedWhereYouUseYourGoodJudgement> > > > or > > test<SomethingThatYouWouldLikeToEncounterIfYouWereReadingCodeForFirstTime> > > but not > > test<SomethingDogmaticJustForSakeOfDogma> > > :) OK, perhaps dogmatic, but keep code in Harmony clear and readable, or even in the same style in some way is properly good for everyone. geir > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Best Regards! Jimmy, Jing Lv China Software Development Lab, IBM
