Anton Avtamonov wrote: > Tim, that is excellent! Thank you. > > I have couple of minor questions: > > Am I right with interpretation that the primary "source" is the spec > rather than RI behavior? If the spec is consistent and logical, but > contradicts to the RI behavior we are basing on spec? I'm asking just > because that caused lots of debates last time and I want to make sure > everyone agreed with this statement now.
That's what I thought we agreed. If the guide does not make that clear then I am happy to clarify. > Another minor comment regarding to the serialization compatibility: > What if serialization form is not specified and the spec states that > serialization form will not be compatible with future releases? Does > it mean we want to copy the existing serialization form? Or we are > going to define our own? Should it be reflected in the guidelines? I suggest that we copy the current RI form (if we can deduce it honestly) to get better interoperability. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
