Richard Liang wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
how about 'specific'? impl seems to be not very informative.
+1 to Oliver's impl :-)
I have a concern abou proposed package naming guidelines:
package name
org.apache.harmony.security.tests.org.apache.harmony.security
is not much better then 1000-character long test name.
+1. I think the prefix org.apache.harmony.security is unnecessary.
"tests.impl.org.apache.harmony.security" is enough to tell people what
the test cases belong to
Any comments? Thanks a lot.
Our package namespace starts with "org.apache.harmony".
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
