As I understand most of them now separated. We may either 'leave them' or 'mixed' , not both :)
So what did you mean? Thanks, Mikhail 2006/4/27, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I say leave them mixed. We are no more likely to want to run > serialization tests separately than we are locking tests etc. and trying > to layout the tests on disk to represent all the different metadata > about each test case is not going to work. > > Regards, > Tim > > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > On 4/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > >> > >> > >> Stepan Mishura wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'd like to discuss naming conventions for serialization tests - does it > >>> make sense to separate serialization tests from unit tests? > >> I actually don't know. What are the pros/cons? > > > > > > I'd propose to separate them. It seems to me that this approach more > > manageable and flexible, for example, we may wish in future to move > > serialization tests into separate test suite or we can select to run tests > > for serialization only, for example, if we update/improve serialization > > framework. Also we may put(force) some requirements how should test for > > serialization should like. This will unify serialization tests (for example, > > it may be done in a way like SerializationTest does or any other way. Right > > now I wouldn't want to argue whether it is good to create super class to be > > extended by test or not - it will be the next topic :-).) > > In case if we mix testing serialization functionality with tests for API > > methods then we won't have such opportunities. > > > > So the question was: does it make sense to keep serialization test separate > > or everybody OK with mixing them with unit tests for API methods? > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan. > > > > geir > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > IBM Java technology centre, UK. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
