Daniel Gandara wrote: > Tim Ellison wrote >> Mark Hindess wrote: >>> On 17 May 2006 at 12:30, "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> Mark Hindess wrote: >>>>> Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> I've just contributed a JIRA, >>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471 >>>>> that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14 >>>>> version. Only the code at the moment, I creating the scripts/patches >>>>> for the tests next.) >>>> We've been working on improvements to the rmi test suite, >>>> I've contributed that at >>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-473 >>>> (I created a new JIRA since previous one HARMONY-211 was closed-) >>>> so please take that test suite. >>> >>> Thanks for the heads-up. I just saw the JIRA messages. (I notice it >>> includes all the code again and is classified as a contribution. But >>> I assume this is just a derivative work of the previous contribution >>> rather than a new contribution? That is we don't need to wait for >>> another vote.) >> >> I disagree -- i think the simplest thing would be for Daniel to submit >> the delta rather than another version of the original contribution. > > ok, I can do that, I did not mean to create a problem :) > we reorganized (renamed) the test suite for a better understanding, > that's why I uploaded the whole thing, but I can submit a delta. > > which would be the procedure for me to send the delta? create a new > JIRA with just the changes to the previous code? clasify it as "classlib"?
A new JIRA to improve the rmi2 module would be great, thanks Daniel. Feel free to send 'the recipe' (svn commands or description) for renames etc. rather than a diff where it makes sense. Regards, Tim >>> Integrating the tests was proving interesting. Have you been following >>> the discussion of the test naming/layout conventions? The latest >>> proposal is here: >>> >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/testing.html >>> >>> >>> I was having a little difficulty in (quickly) figuring out which tests >>> are implementation-independent (api) tests. Or indeed which tests will >>> run stand-alone without any infrastructure being configured. Perhaps >>> you could help? I don't really like the idea of integrating code >>> without at least some tests that everyone can run. >>> >>> In the meantime, I'll take a look at the new JIRA. >>> >>>> Daniel Gandara >>>> BTW: we are a bunch of Daniels here at Cordoba :))) >>> >>> ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> -Mark. >>> >>>>> On 17 May 2006 at 11:19, "Daniel Fridlender" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> After a discussion we had a few weeks ago in this forum on the >>>>>> different implementations of java.math donated to Harmony >>>>>> (Harmony-(39+380) and Harmony-199) we (ITC) decided to voluteer for >>>>>> the task of integrating them into a single implementation which would >>>>>> benefit from the best features of Harmony-39, 380 and 199. >>>>>> >>>>>> We will consider comparing on a method-by-method level but also on >>>>>> ideas level so that the new implementation will probably require >>>>>> re-programming good ideas from the existing implementations. In the >>>>>> case of BigInteger we will also compare the benefits of the different >>>>>> internal representations. >>>>>> >>>>>> Right now we are analysing the two implementations. Once we are done >>>>>> with this analysis we will make it public and propose a way to >>>>>> proceed >>>>>> towards an integration. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW, we had problems patching Harmony-380 over Harmony-39, it >>>>>> attempts >>>>>> to erase non-existing lines. Did we miss something? Is there any >>>>>> other intermediate patch that we have missed? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Daniel Fridlender >>>>>> ITC >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> IBM Java technology centre, UK. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
