Alexander, I've looked at the existing JUnit extensions and some ot them look quite similar to your generator proposal at first glance.
The list of extentions is here: http://www.junit.org/news/extension/index.htm The most relevant seem to be: JUnitPerf and JMTUnit . I'm not sure that their license fits Harmony (JUnitPerf has BSD one and the license of JMTUnit is not specified on the project page) but the functionality seems to be very close to the generator. The main difference I see now is that your tool supports command-line parsing and those ones need creating additional JUnit tests that contain wrappes for existing ones. Here is an example of JUnitPerf test that runs some JUnit test (Test1) in 2 threads 20 times in each thread (imports omitted): public class JUnitPerfTest1 { public static void main(String[] args) { Test testCase = new TestSuite(Test1.class); Test loadTest = new LoadTest(testCase, 2, 20); junit.textui.TestRunner.run(loadTest); } } My question is: are there any strong reasons for creating yet another framework or we can reuse an existing one? -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
