On 5/26/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's right. When we compile with Sun's compiler it compiles against the Sun class libraries, and when we compile with the Harmony (ECJ-based) javac it compiles against the Harmony class libraries.
Tim, maybe does it make sense adding the RI rt.jar to CLASSPATH for the ECJ-based compiler? In this case all we didn't implemented will be taken from RI. Is this a stupid idea? Thanks, Vladimir. You could pass in the -classpath to our javac to pick up the reference
implementation of the class libraries, but we should aim to fill in these gaps asap. Regards, Tim Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2006/5/26, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> We don't have java.util.Scanner and >> so the only reason it is compiling is because the RI compiler assumes >> its own bootstrap classes so finds its java.util.Scanner. > Yes, this can be a reason. > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
