Mark Hindess wrote: > On 8 June 2006 at 11:54, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Alexey Petrenko wrote: >>> Mark, >>> >>> I understand your concerns about static linking of the large number >>> of the libraries... We thought about this too... >>> >>> But we decided that for now it is the best way: we have to manage >>> only few libraries inside the Harmony deploy directory... Which is >>> changing its contents so often :) > > Alexey, as I said, I understand that this was a pragmatic choice and > we've made similar choices elsewhere. > >> I was holding my tongue on marks post > > I think we agree?
Indeed :) > >> - lets not waste too much time discussing the dependencies. Certainly >> for distributions, we'll bundle them in where appropriate (like a >> tarball), or not (like an rpm where the deps can be specified as part >> of the delivery system) > > Yeah. That's reasonable. It might actually need a little support from > the build system(s) to handle the 'deps' behaviour - because we are > statically linking things that would be better linked dynamicall - but > I'm happy to help with that when the time comes. > > Regards, > Mark. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
