Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 6/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I think it should be there. As I remember Mark added it there after
build failures.
Old files could make the build mistakenly passing.
I don't understand.
What prevents someone from doing
$ ant clean; ant;
to solve that?
Then we have to perform "clean" explicitly each time that seems for me
annoying too.
I was OK with "clean" as a default action.
So do we have the choice not to clean when running the script manually?
yes - you have to type "ant build" or something.
I see, thank you.
I've never seen a default "clean" before, which is why I find it annoying :)
+1, I guess for daily work, it is more frequently to update one or two
files and then build.
geir
Thanks,
Stepan.
geir
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/6/16, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I hope that no one really is bothered by that. It's just so annoying
:)
If you are, feel free to put it back (or I will ) and then lets
discuss?
geir
------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
