Pls see below... On 6/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In which case, we may be better off updating DRLVM to >>handle the full 1.5 compile instead of doing these hardloads. >What is a "hardload"?
Typo :-) hardcoding the creation of the lang/Class superinterfaces.
> And we can just treat these hard changes as partial fixes to keep things >> working, pending the full DRLVM update, and drop completely the need to >> keep >> a version 1.4 compatible. Could someone advise if that is OK? >We don't really *need* to be 1.4 compatible.
OK, thanks for clarifying. Thanks, Rana
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
