On 6/21/06, Mark Hindess wrote:
On 21 June 2006 at 10:35, "Stepan Mishura" wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > I believe that 'move' means copying file with its revisions history. This > can be done by 'svn move'. You did this for 'hyproperties.xml' file but not > for 'build.xml' file. Why? Yes, it is possible to figure out from its > initial revision (415681) what was the origin. But I prefer to have unbroken > revisions history. I probably should have provided more information on the commit message. Sorry. The "move" (as discussed on the "Simplifying..." thread) actually took all but a few lines of _both_: make/common/build.xml, and make/common/build.xml
Did you mean make/common/build.xml, and make/build.xml I don't believe there is a way to keep the history of both and keeping
history of just one would probably have been equally confusing.
Yes, you are right there is no such way. But I expected that make/common/build.xml would be the origin for module's build.xml.
Happy to take suggestions on what you think I should have done.
May be I missed something in the "Simplifying..." thread so I expected to see something like: 'svn move make/common/build.xml build.xml' + some edits in moved build.xml IMHO, it makes easer to track what was changed. Thanks, Stepan. Regards,
Mark. <SNIP>
------------------------------------------------------ Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
