Andrew,
How the current Harmony codes looks like?
According to our compatibility guideline[1], we should stick to Spec if
it is clearly stated.
[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/compat.html
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi everybody,
I found a bug of SocketChannel.socket() of RI.
Consider following test case:
public void test_socket() throws IOException {
SocketChannel sc = SocketChannel.open();
Socket socket = sc.socket();
assertFalse(socket.isBound());
// RI returns 0 instead of -1 here.
assertEquals(-1, socket.getLocalPort());
}
RI 1.5 fails while Harmony passes.
"returns the local port number to which this socket is bound or -1 if the
socket is not bound yet." That's how spec describes getLocalPort method.
RI returns 0 for an unbound socket, violates spec apparently.
How shall we deal with this bug to bug compatibility?
Any suggestions? Thank you very much!
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
