Odd. Nothing should have changed re log4cxx Sure nothing else changed?
geir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just tried building DRLVM out of svn on FC5, and it has a > build error that I've seen before. This issue was resolved > when I was using r413745, but now I am using r416471 and it > is back. The error is below: > > Thanks, > Naveen > > > build.native.cpp: > [cc] Starting dependency analysis for 136 files. > [cc] 136 files are up to date. > [cc] 0 files to be recompiled from dependency > analysis. > [cc] 5 total files to be compiled. > > [cc] /work/nneelaka/Sandbox/HarmonyVM/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_rele > ase/semis/extra/log4cxx/src/include/log4cxx/xml/domconfigurat > or.h:243: error: extra qualification ? > log4cxx::xml::DOMConfigurator::? on member ?subst? > > [cc] /work/nneelaka/Sandbox/HarmonyVM/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_rele > ase/semis/extra/log4cxx/src/include/log4cxx/helpers/unicodehe > lper.h:98: error: extra qualification ? > log4cxx::helpers::UnicodeHelper::? on member ?lengthUTF8? > > [cc] /work/nneelaka/Sandbox/HarmonyVM/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_rele > ase/semis/extra/log4cxx/src/include/log4cxx/helpers/unicodehe > lper.h:98: error: extra qualification ? > log4cxx::helpers::UnicodeHelper::? on member ?lengthUTF8? > > [cc] /work/nneelaka/Sandbox/HarmonyVM/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_rele > ase/semis/extra/log4cxx/src/include/log4cxx/xml/domconfigurat > or.h:243: error: extra qualification ? > log4cxx::xml::DOMConfigurator::? on member ?subst? > > [cc] /work/nneelaka/Sandbox/HarmonyVM/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_rele > ase/semis/extra/log4cxx/src/include/log4cxx/helpers/unicodehe > lper.h:98: error: extra qualification ? > log4cxx::helpers::UnicodeHelper::? on member ?lengthUTF8? > > On 6/10/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 10 June 2006 at 0:03, Naveen Neelakantam > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I just tried building DRLVM out of svn. I am running > Fedora Core 5 >>> with gcc version 4.1.0 20060304 (Red Hat 4.1.0-3). >>> >>> However, I am getting the build error shown below. > Previous posts on >>> the dev list led me to believe that this issue had been > resolved. >>> Did a patch get lost in the transition to svn? >> Hi Naveen, >> >> I'm still testing the latest version of Ivan's patch > mentioned in the >> message below, so it is not committed in svn yet. (I hope > to finish >> testing it today or tomorrow.) But I don't see a JIRA > with Vladimir's >> fixes for FC5 so I don't think this will help you. >> >> Vladimir, can you create a new JIRA with your additional > changes (on top >> of Ivan's patch or on drlvm/trunk if I've committed Ivan's > patch by the >> time you read this.) >> Regards, >> Mark. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Naveen >>> >>> On May 19, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Vladimir Gorr wrote: >>> >>>> Small changes are required to fix the build issue for > Fedora 5. >>>> I've prepared this patch and I'm ready to put it into > JIRA. >>>> There are two ways to make this thing: >>>> - renew the cumulative patch created by Ivan (see JIRA > issue below); >>>> - attach these changes as separate patch and adding it > to the >> HARMONY-443. >>>> What way is more preferable? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Vladimir. >>>> >>>> On 5/5/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>>>> The updated patch "DRLVM-GCC-3.4_and_4.x- > cumulative.patch" is now in >>>>> Harmony-443 JIRA with detailed instructions. >>>>> >>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-443 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
