Rana Dasgupta wrote: > On 6/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Pavel Pervov wrote: >> >> Geir, >> >> >> >> What's the first thing we do? >> >> I'd suggest switching the build to 1.5. >> >> >> >> The rest will come shortly :) >> >> >Now that's a plan! :) > > > Hi Geir, > Actually what Pavel says makes sense. Not sure what plan we need. We could > do it either way. We can make some changes to the class structure, loader, > and the jit/interpreter, and submit a couple of patches. It is not the > "huge" patch that you have mentioned .. 7-8 files or so. Or we can switch > the build first. This will break drlvm for a short time, and we can > submit a > couple of bug fixes to get it going again. This way, we will just add the > minimum needed for removing the compiler hack. Whatever way you think makes > sense. > However, you started this thread with saying "no patch over the wall" > and making this "learning exercise about DRLVM". Where are you going with > this? Do you want to actually enumerate/discuss which source files need to > change and in what way, on this thread so that more people can participate? > > Marginally confused :-) > Rana
Just for the record, my goal was to avoid 'moving the goalposts' for drlvm to integrate with the classlib and run the tests, apps, etc. If consensus here is that moving to 5.0 (and thereby delaying that goal) is more desirable then I'm happy to go along with it, though I'm keen to get the entire end-to-end story working soonest. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
