Tim Ellison wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >> Except... >> >> 1) They aren't as Jimmy suggests, at least the one's I'm looking at. >> >> 2) the implementation in hymem.c just calls malloc() >> >> I'm confused. > > Hopefully you are no longer confused after Oliver's explanation.
Yes, although I am still confused why you would want to do this. We have an implementation in hymem.c : hymem_alloc_memory( HyPortLib *, int ) which looks just like hymem_alloc_memory(int) (if you use the right header) and it calls what might be two radically different things. Why do we have himem.c? Should we rename? Toss? geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
