Mark Hindess wrote: > On 7 July 2006 at 0:43, "Ivan Volosyuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 7/7/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I can make this patch. One question, is it ok to have same property as >> DRLVM for release mode? Like this: >> BUILD_CFG=release > > I'm happy with release and debug but the top-level interface (and > the module-level interface too for that matter) is ant - make should > not be called directly - so it will probably need to be an ant property.
I'm perfectly happy w/ this at high level. > > I was thinking: > > 1) adding a 'hy.native.cfg' property to make/properties.xml > > 2) converting this in to an environment variable so what like hy.hdk > gets converted to HY_HDK. > Can we please stop with this "HY" stuff? The project is "Harmony". > 3) adding !if/ifeq directives in defines.mak and makefile.include to > define the CFG_CFLAGS and CFG_LDFLAGS with just the subset of flags > for debug/optimisation. > > 4) breaking up the existing flags variables and defining them in terms > of separate defines for different types of flags CFG flags, warning > flags, etc. > > That's just my first thoughts I'd might not end up doing it quite like > that if I actually tried to do it. ;-) > Is that overspecifying it for a first run? Just having "debug/release" would be cool to start. geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
