On 7/13/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I assume you mean [drlvm], since java.lang.Class in [classlib] is just a stub, right? Anyway, what would you say exactly? That our "not in any particular order" is different than the "not in any particular order" that the RI does? I'm not trying to make light of it, but it sounds like all is correct.
IMHO, If Harmony VM could act the same as that of RI, the thing would be better. geir
Alexei Zakharov wrote: > Hi, > > I have discovered we have small incompatibility in our java.lang.Class > implementation. The order of elements returned by > Class.getDeclaredMethods() differs from RI. The spec says here: "The > elements in the array returned are not sorted and are not in any > particular order." But I already know one application that relies on > this - this was one of java.beans test (already patched). I don't want > to say this is somehow bad but still like to inform the community > about this issue. Probably we need to rise non-bug differences JIRA? > > Thanks, > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Andrew Zhang China Software Development Lab, IBM
