Vladimir Gorr wrote: > Indeed we need to re-base the plugin patch for DRLVM due to the recent > changes (renaming ij to java). > However all 'hacks' cannot be removed due to the original sources of plugin > refer to the clearvm library > DRLVM doesn't suppose to have. We will post these change a little later (we > need to make sure all works). > Is next Monday suitable for you?
I don't need a patch (I can figure out the ij->java issues - select with mouse, cut, save) as much as some understanding that the whole 'clearvm' thing and the hacks around it are not harmful. Clearly this isn't optimal, and will need to be refactored, but I just want someone who knows eclipse and J9 (hint, Tim, hint) to say "sure, go for it" geir > > Thanks, > Vladimir. > > > On 7/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Part of the original DRLM contribution is a patch for the eclipse >> plugin. When I shifted DRLVM to produce "java" rather than "ij" as the >> program name, much of the patch went away. >> >> However, there is still some that I honestly didn't understand, as it >> seems like were working in and around a bunch of hacks. I'm happy to >> spend the time and really figure it out, but there's enough people >> around here who grok eclipse well enough to tell me if I can integrate >> the remaining changes and get this done. >> >> So please? Help? >> >> geir >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
