If we create separate module for each provider then number of modules is going to be too big... (e.g. RI has 6 or 7 providers)
Thanks, Mikhail 2006/7/24, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/19/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote: > > A long ago we agreed that providers go into a separate module. But > now I think it's might be not very reasonable. Hi Mikhail, Why you think that is not reasonable? Here is the initial proposal: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200601.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Stepan. Sun keeps certificates in its own proprietary format (JKS), while we have > BKS from Bouncy Castle, so files will have to be converted. I can do this > next week > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > 2006/7/19, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > >> I'm integrating HARMONY-536, the JSSE provider. Two things: > > >> > > >> 1) it's contributed to go into x-net, but the package namespace is > > >> > > >> o.a.h.security.provider.jsse > > >> > > >> so I wonder if this would be better off in the security module. If > not, > > >> we are stuck because we don't have a 'negative' patternset for jar > > >> packaging, so it's getting sucked into security jar right now anyway > :) > > > > > > IMHO it should be in x-net. Can't you rename the package? > > > > > > > Of course. Something was going to get moved, just wanted to see any > > other opinions.. > > > > > > >> 2) I have a little test proggie that shows that it's negotiating w/ > the > > >> other side, but given we have no cacerts, it whines and gives up. > (It's > > >> a reasonable whine...) Lazily and naively, I threw the cacerts from > > >> Sun's JRE into jre/lib/security and prayed, but the security deities > are > > >> not smiling on me today. So, where does/what format/etc/etc should > our > > >> root cert file go? > > > > > > Dunno. I know you were just playing, but AIUI the use of root > > > certificates for popular CA's cost $'s don't they? > > > > I didn't think so. I thought that they gave the root certs away because > > the value of a cert provider is directly proportional to the amount of > > software out there that can understand it's certs... > > > > > > > > Hopefully Boris will enlighten us to the format used. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Tim > > -- Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division ------------------------------------------------------ Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
