Marina Goldburt wrote:
On 7/25/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you honour the existing table layout then you don't need to break
compatibility. In addition, VMs are not required to use the class
library portlib if they choose not to.
I don't know the way IBM VME uses the portlibrary, but concerning the
DRLVM
(vm/vmi/src/vmi.cpp), the DRLVM needs recompilation if the HyPortLibrary
structure changes as Paulex described.
But it's ok since
>Harmony has its own vm and nobody uses j9 vm binaries.
This is a joke right? There are three VMs in various states of
development at Harmony, and people are also using the IBM VME.
As the official Apache Harmony site doesn't have the link to IBM VME, I
thought people are not using it.
Not meaning to speak for Tim, but just for your (and anyone else's
reading this)
info, there is actually a link to the IBM VME download site on the
"Building
the Apache Harmony Class Library" page [1].
Regards,
Oliver
[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/build_classlib.html
And about IBM VME, are there any plans to publish the binaries for 64-bit
platforms?
Thanks, Marina
--
Oliver Deakin
IBM United Kingdom Limited
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
