If API says (from the forst message message):
"If this channel was not created by the same provider as the given selector"
then the way you create the channel but not provider is important.
?
On 7/27/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/27/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Zhang wrote:
> > Seems strange.
> >
> > Following test fails against RI.
> >
> > The spec of SelectableChannel.register() says:
"IllegalSelectorExceptoin
> > -- If this channel was not created by the same provider as the given
> > selector".
> Same instance or same SelectorProvider subclass?
I think it's same instance. As you may notice, I use "assertSame(
channel.provider(), selector.provider());" in the test.
RI passes this assert statement and fails at channel.register(...) because
of IllegalSelectorException.
That's why I think RI is illogical in this case.
Any comments?
>
> > I suggest follow spec for this case. Thanks!
> >
> > public void test_channel() throws Exception {
> > SelectorProvider provider = SelectorProvider.provider();
> > Selector selector = Selector.open();
> > MockChannel channel = new MockChannel(provider);
> > channel.configureBlocking(false);
> > assertSame(channel.provider(), selector.provider());
> > // test fails here against RI, IllegalSelectorException is thrown
> > channel.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_READ);
> > selector.select();
> > }
> >
> > class MockChannel extends SocketChannel {
> >
> > protected MockChannel(SelectorProvider arg0) {
> > super(arg0);
> > }
> >
> > public Socket socket() {
> > return null;
> > }
> >
> > public boolean isConnected() {
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > public boolean isConnectionPending() {
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > public boolean connect(SocketAddress arg0) throws IOException {
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > public boolean finishConnect() throws IOException {
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > public int read(ByteBuffer arg0) throws IOException {
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > public long read(ByteBuffer[] arg0, int arg1, int arg2) throws
> > IOException {
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > public int write(ByteBuffer arg0) throws IOException {
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > public long write(ByteBuffer[] arg0, int arg1, int arg2) throws
> > IOException {
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > protected void implCloseSelectableChannel() throws IOException {
> >
> > }
> >
> > protected void implConfigureBlocking(boolean arg0) throws
> > IOException {
> >
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Jimmy, Jing Lv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi:
> >> I find that RI behaves strange in
> >> java.nio.channels.SelectableChannel.register. in NIO, channels and
> >> selector must be created by Provider. The doc reads: (Invoking
> >> register() should throw) "IllegalSelectorException - If this channel
> was
> >> not created by the same provider as the given selector". To check if
> the
> >> two providers are the same, Harmony use
> >> "if(selector.provider()==selector.provider)... ", however it seems
not
> >> correct.
> >> If we mock a channel extends SelectableChannel, put the same
> >> provider of selector as its provider, and register this channel to
> >> selector, RI fails with a IllegalSelectorException though two
providers
> >> are the same. I have no idea if how RI do without checking providers
> are
> >> the same?
> >> Another thing is that if a selector has no channels register on
it,
> >> invoke an operation of select() surely has nothing to do. In this
way,
> >> Harmony returns immediately even invoking a block select(), however
RI
> >> wait forever there, for nothing. I think Harmony's behavior is
logical,
> >> but not compatible with RI. It seems a bug of RI, I suggest keep it
as
> >> it is.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Best Regards!
> >>
> >> Jimmy, Jing Lv
> >> China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Paulex Yang
> China Software Development Lab
> IBM
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Andrew Zhang
China Software Development Lab, IBM
--
Mikhail Fursov
