On 8/11/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took a look at the HARMONY-1041 tool. It is fine, I have only minor comments: - do you think we need to separate the Message and MsgUtil types? Given that they are generated from a template I'd be inclined to combine them into a single type now. We have no need to look in that file in general. If you do choose to combine them then I would expect the resulting header to be (c) 1998, 2006. - Minor typo "Better make changes in the teamplate file." -> template. Ilya Okomin wrote: > I would suggest to split this task into a set of jira sub-issues, one > module - one issue. This kind of division would give us an > opportunity this work to be done in a parallel mode. Agreed. I suggest that we run the msgtool on the existing modules and commit the generated code and catalog files, then the incoming patches can assume they are there and use them to fix the externalization.
Hello, Tim! I've made changes to the generation tool [1] and also prepared patch with the set of generated files according to the existing modules set I've raised issue for that [2]. Not all modules were included into the generation (full set can be found in comments to the [2]). E.g. x-net module has package xnet, also I'm not sure about necessity to make internationalization in suncompat or rmi2, etc. You can check list of suggested modules and if something is missed I'll make update. Waiting for your comments and proposals! [1]http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1041 [2]http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1201 Regards, Ilya. Regards,
Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- -- Ilya Okomin Intel Middleware Products Division
