Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before acting to make sure that nobody objects such approach.
On 8/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that's a great idea. Have you isolated any of the errors? geir On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Anton Luht wrote: > Hello, > > Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on > Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit > tests. Results of those tests: > > BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM : > 810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%) > > Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0 > 766 tests, 2 failures, 110 errors (85.38%) > > Maybe it's worth to consider MX4j JUnit tests first and then try to > fix ActiveMQ? > > MX4J is used not only in ActiveMQ but in other apps like Tomcat as > well. > > [1] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net
-- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
