The coverage information was updated on the wiki. Also, coverage for accessibility, awt, instrument and sound modules was added. I have a problem to calculate coverage for swing module (test run hang up) so issue 564 will be updated later.
thanks, Vladimir On 6/20/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Classes from exclude list are now specified as green. > I've update wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information) > and > coverage pages. > Great, thank you, Vladimir! > Thanks, > Vladimir > > > On 6/16/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Vladimir >> >> Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> >> >> >> The current reports don't provide code source linking. Are you >> going to >> >> >> add it? >> > >> > >> > There were no information for 'security' and 'auth' modules, but, I >> have >> > updated the pages and now there is source code linking for all >> modules. >> > >> > One more issue to discuss: excluded classes present in the coverage >> table >> > now with 0 coverage. May be it is more convenient do not have these >> > classes >> > in coverage tables at all? In this case one won't wonder why the class >> > has 0 >> > coverage - go to exclude list to look at the class and decide whether >> the >> > class is really untested or just excluded from coverage, instead, all >> > really >> > uncovered classes will be shown with 0 coverage, if a class is >> missed in >> > coverage table – it is in exclude list. >> +1 for current "0 coverage" is not convenient. But if we can remove them >> from the report, how about just mark them in another way? say, mark the >> excluded class with different background colors? >> >> At least people don't need to care about two documents for one package. >> > Thanks, >> > Vladimir >> > >> > >> > >> >> Now I have 2 questions/ issues to discuss: >> >> > 1) preferable VM to calculate coverage (seems, the exclude list >> is a >> >> > little >> >> > bit different for j9 and drlvm) >> >> >> >> >> >> If the only difference is the exclude list then I'd suggest using VM >> >> with >> >> the shortest one. :-) >> >> >> >> 2) preferable sorting mode for results (by name, by blocks or by >> >> methods) >> >> >> >> >> >> IMHO, sorting by name looks more natural. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Stepan. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> > Vladimir >> >> > >> >> > <SNIP> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- >> Paulex Yang >> China Software Development Lab >> IBM >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -- Paulex Yang China Software Development Lab IBM --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
