Andrey Chernyshev wrote:

I agree that j.u.c. will need efficient inlining for the Unsafe.
However, if the Harmony impl of Unsafe does nothing but simple call
forwarding to the appropriate methods of vmmagic, then we probably
won't get that big overhead.
In other words, we can try keeping Unsafe interface as a bridge
between j.u.c. and various VM's at the price of one extra method call
to it's "real" implementation (which could be vmmagic in our case). It
would be nice, however, if we can agree with the concurrency group to
hide Unsafe under some other interface which would have a more neutral
package name (e.g. not sun.misc).


Agreed. I think though that we should demonstrate why we want the package change by successfully integrating into Harmony.

geir




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to