Both solutions are possible.
2006/9/6, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is there a reason to have two different options for classes and for tests?
Why not have -Dwith.awt.swing for both?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/6, Alexey Petrenko (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1392?page=all ]
>
> Alexey Petrenko updated HARMONY-1392:
> -------------------------------------
>
> Attachment: HARMONY-1392.diff
>
> > Different properties are used to run awt and swing tests
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: HARMONY-1392
> > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1392
> > Project: Harmony
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Components: Classlib
> > Reporter: Alexey Petrenko
> > Attachments: HARMONY-1392.diff
> >
> >
> > We need to set different properties to run awt and swing tests. And this is
wrong.
> > I suggest set with.awt.swing.tests property as for awt.
> > I'll prepare the patch shortly
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
