Definitely. I will do it today and add a page to our "how are we
doing?" page so we can track over time.
(That and any other benchmark we're allowed to use and publish).
I think that what we have is mighty impressive. (It's just the
graphics numbers that are bad...)
geir
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:47 AM, Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I've been playing a bit with caffinemark, and our numbers for
everything except graphics are amazing.
Convenient to post some results vs RI? I believe many ones(includes
myself of course) would be very interest to see the numbers:)
However, our graphics numbers are *terrible*. I was testing on
Ubuntu. We need to fix this. Does anyone with familiarity with
our swing/awt impl that could point us in the right direction?
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]