Definitely. I will do it today and add a page to our "how are we doing?" page so we can track over time.

(That and any other benchmark we're allowed to use and publish).

I think that what we have is mighty impressive. (It's just the graphics numbers that are bad...)

geir

On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:47 AM, Paulex Yang wrote:

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I've been playing a bit with caffinemark, and our numbers for everything except graphics are amazing.
Convenient to post some results vs RI? I believe many ones(includes myself of course) would be very interest to see the numbers:)

However, our graphics numbers are *terrible*. I was testing on Ubuntu. We need to fix this. Does anyone with familiarity with our swing/awt impl that could point us in the right direction?

geir


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to